BGG helps all levels of administration, NGOs, businesses and residents work together on the Canary Islands
BGG helps all levels of administration, NGOs, businesses and residents work together on the Canary Islands

An interview with Aridane González, Lead of Case Study Canary Islands

The Canary Islands are an autonomous community of Spain, located west of Morocco and Western Sahara. They are an interesting Case Study for the project BlueGreen Governance (BGG), because their ecosystems are critical with a high ecological value and significant biological diversity. The coastal areas are the most vulnerable to sea level rising through climate change. But the coast is also the most densely populated, largely linked to tourism, a mainstay of the Canarian economy, and the location of communities and infrastructure. Case Study Lead Aridane González tells us about their experiences with BGG so far.

Who is Aridane González? 

Senior Lecturer at University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

Case study lead Canary Islands

Q: Can you sketch the starting point for the Canary Islands as a Case Study in the project BlueGreen Governance?

Aridane González:
“On the Canary Islands we are eight islands. In BGG we have chosen the island of Gran Canaria as an example for the rest. Our focus lies on the impact of a rising sea level on the coast, tourism, hospitality and natural heritage. With BGG we hope to coordinate our governance to make it more effective. For this, three workshops have been planned. Two have taken place in 2025 and 2026, the third is planned for the end of the year.”

Q: How is governance organised on the islands?

Aridane González:
“As islands we face an extra layer of administration, making it five: EU, national, regional, island (cabildo) and municipal. The interrelationship between these levels is one of our challenges, regarding both collaboration and capacity. We also face excessive bureaucracy, limited citizen participation, a weak integration of scientific knowledge into policymaking processes, and the common challenge of sectoral division.”

Q: Who attended the workshops?


Aridane González:

“We invited the technical people from all administration levels, municipal, island, regional, up to the national level. But also representatives from NGOs in conservation attended, scientists and some residents from the civil population, who represent the local, traditional values. At the first workshop we also welcomed some people from one of the other islands, Tenerife, to learn and provide input. At both workshops some forty to fifty people attended.

Explaining the importance of the project to the regional and national governments and NGOs, opened the doors for collaboration. They feel they are not just participants, but really part of the project, getting results. NGOs also feel that they can use the project as a microphone towards the government.”

Q: Can you tell us more about Workshop 1 (WS1)? What did you do and what did you find?

Aridane González:
“In WS1 we wanted to paint the bigger picture for the land-sea governance, using the example of the sea level rise. What are the hotspot sites for sea level rise and how are tourism and hospitality affected? As BGG we don’t want to tell people what to do, but we want to know the real problems and talk about solutions. People were very actively participating in the workshop.

The participants identified sea level rise and flooding as key environmental risks. They also emphasized coastal erosion, biodiversity loss, and the intensification of extreme weather events as factors affecting beaches and productive sectors such as tourism and fisheries, in addition to impacting essential ecosystem services.

These changes are seen as not only damaging the coastal zone but also jeopardizing the sustainability of marine-coastal environments and the quality of life of local communities. Other problems affecting coast and sea are the rapid expansion of tourism infrastructure, and additionally, salinization, pollution from untreated wastewater, industrial discharges, and agricultural runoff.

The most important conclusion was that the land-sea interface encounters a lot of regulations, linked to different levels of administration. This makes decision making difficult and hinders solutions. We also found that the communication between the different administration levels leaves room for improvement. Another conclusion was that problems are often solved in a sectoral way and that there are not always enough people with the right competence on the islands.

For example, there is a location where people could be relocated in the future because of sea level rise. They have been living there for 50, 100 years, so they don’t want to move. It is important to know why they don’t want to move, so we can address this problem in cooperation. The local population has different questions to address in relation with tradition, feelings, etc. In other words: to drive true change, it is essential to simplify bureaucracy, clarify responsibilities, secure sufficient resources, and promote collaboration among all involved actors.

None of these conclusions come as a great surprise. The point is, however, that different people from all levels and sectors of administration, NGOs, hospitality, businesses and residents had the opportunity to talk about these challenges together and cooperate to bring about solutions. The land-sea interface needs holistic solutions from all the stakeholders.”

Q: And what happened during Workshop 2 (WS2)?

Aridane González:
“We shared the results from WS1 with the participants, and interviewed several of them, as input for the next workshop. During WS2, we presented the previous results in order to show they are part of the project and their participation is taken into account. We explored different climate scenarios to get information about policy scenarios in the land-sea interface. We identified the different sides that participants represent and split into subgroups. Each subgroup focused on a different scenario in a different location, also chosen by the participants.

Originally the idea was to use the dashboard that is being developed in BGG, but we found them not to be applicable yet to our situation. We are working on getting regional projections. The data on which the tools are based are often too pixelated to be usable on small islands like ours. But of course, we did use the available data for projections of sea level, temperature rise and impacts. Note that we have different projections in the islands that are also linked with BGG and demonstrated that BGG is working in connection with the existing science.”

Q: What are the plans for Workshop 3 (WS3), later this year?

Aridane González:
“In the last workshop we hope to have the dashboard with foresight tools ready for us. We will present the scenarios from WS2, and the go directly to solutions. We are looking forward to it, and feel sure that the participants will again provide their input and creativity to find solutions together.”

Want to learn more?

See the article in Ocean and Society, 2 September 2025: Governance Challenges for the Adaptation to Sea‐Level Rise in the Canary Islands: A Multilevel Approach

This article is part of the Ocean and Society issue Transforming Coastal Governance: Challenges, Experiences, and Ways Forward, edited by Raoul Beunen (Open University of the Netherlands) and Gianluca Ferraro (University of Portsmouth)

 

More blogs

Scroll to Top

Discover more from BlueGreen Governance

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading