
The Isle of Wight is a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve where biodiversity conservation, cultural heritage, and sustainable development are closely connected. Around 75% of the island is protected through various environmental designations, while the southeast coastal zone faces major pressures from erosion, flooding, and climate change.
The case study focuses on the Eastern Yar watershed and the Biosphere Core Coastal Zone, where sea-level rise, storm intensity, and coastal squeeze threaten communities, infrastructure, and valuable habitats. Nature-based solutions are increasingly seen as essential for building long-term resilience.





Lead Aridane Gonzalez:
Problem statement
Problem statement
The main challenge on the Isle of Wight is the fragmented governance of coastal and marine management, combined with short-term decision-making and limited public understanding of coastal risks. Current policies often rely on “hold the line” strategies, prioritising expensive coastal defence maintenance rather than adaptive long-term planning. Multiple overlapping designations such as MCZs, SSSIs, RAMSAR sites, and the Biosphere Reserve further complicate ownership, responsibilities, and stakeholder engagement. At the same time, poor water quality, tourism pressure, youth outmigration, and limited funding increase vulnerability across the island.
Impact
The case study highlights the need to shift from reactive coastal defence toward integrated land-sea governance that combines infrastructure, ecosystem restoration, and community resilience. Projects such as the Eastern Yar floodplain restoration show how reconnecting rivers to historic floodplains can reduce flooding while improving biodiversity. Stakeholders also stressed the importance of improving ocean literacy, making policy more accessible, and involving local communities more actively in decision-making. The Isle of Wight demonstrates how island communities can become testing grounds for innovative coastal adaptation and long-term blue-green governance.
Workshops
Workshop 1
Stakeholder insights
Workshop 2
Vulnerability Assessment
Workshop 3
Governance Challenges and Future Planning
The Solent - Workshop 1
Workshop 1 (WS1) was the first stakeholder dialogue within the Blue Green Governance (BGG) case study for the Isle of Wight (IOW), focusing on the southeast coastal zone of the island, including part of the Eastern Yar watershed and the Biosphere Core Coastal Zone.
Participants
The workshop brought together stakeholders primarily from environmental NGOs, alongside representatives from governance, research, and community networks, to identify the key environmental pressures, governance barriers, and long-term adaptation needs of the island’s coastal system. The Isle of Wight Biosphere—recognized as a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve—provided the wider framework, emphasizing biodiversity conservation, cultural heritage, and sustainable coastal development.
Focus and objective
The workshop focused strongly on the relationship between coastal climate risks and governance failures: the issue was not only how to respond to erosion, flooding, and sea-level rise, but how to create a governance system capable of long-term adaptation.
Main climate and environmental pressures
Major climate pressures
- Sea-level rise: especially affecting low-lying areas such as Sandown Bay, Bembridge, and the Eastern Yar floodplain; Increasing coastal squeeze and loss of protected marshland.
- Storm intensity and frequency: more severe storms damage aging coastal defenses, causing increased cliff instability, landslips, and flooding. Ventnor and Shanklin are particularly vulnerable
- Coastal erosion: a major concern along the south and southeast coast. Threatens housing, businesses, and long-term viability of coastal communities
- Pluvial flooding: Flash flooding risk increasing in the Eastern Yar catchment and drainage pinch points.
Additional human pressures
- coastal urban development,
- sewage discharge and water pollution,
- agricultural nutrient runoff,
- overdependence on seasonal tourism,
- low public awareness of marine ecosystems,
- demographic decline through youth outmigration.
Important insight
- Stakeholders stressed that conversations often focus on immediate infrastructure failures rather than on the broader future of coastal communities.
Key vulnerabilities and conflicts
Key vulnerabilities
- Youth outmigration: The loss of young people from the island is identified as a key vulnerability which threatens long-term social and economic viability. Stakeholders warned this could lead to depopulation within decades. It raises questions about maintaining costly infrastructure in the future.
- Economic instability caused by dependence on tourism,
- Aging population and increased pressure on health services,
- Low ocean literacy and disengaged communities, and weak public understanding of coastal risks.
Key conflicts
- Decisions about land use, settlement, infrastructure, and community development are often discussed separately, while all are fundamentally linked to the coast.
- Unlike mainland communities, the island has limited inland retreat options, making adaptation far more complex.
- Tension exists between expensive coastal defense investments and long-term uncertainty about which communities can realistically be protected.
Main governance challenges
Short-term policy focus
- Coastal defense strategies focus on immediate protection rather than future adaptation
- “Hold the Line” policy limitations
- Existing policy often assumes communities must remain in place despite increasing risks
Alternative adaptive approaches receive limited investment
- Uncertainty over the right course of action: Difficulty deciding between defense, retreat, and mixed green-grey solutions
- Overlapping institutional responsibilities: Marine Conservation Zones, SSSIs, RAMSAR sites, Biosphere Reserve, and multiple marine agencies create complexity and confusion
- Funding barriers: Adaptation depends heavily on lengthy consultation processes and uncertain access to funding
Important governance gap
There is a strong disconnect between coastal policy and public understanding. Coastal protected areas are poorly understood, and policy is often only discussed when there is a political crisis.
How should participation and public engagement improve?
- Stakeholders emphasized the need for more accessible and practical communication, stronger systems thinking, and wider community engagement.
- They noted that: many people struggle to understand coastal change and sea-level rise, environmental literacy and nature-based literacy are low, policy information is difficult to find and often too complex to interpret (“a full-time job in itself”).
- Participatory mechanisms already exist through: Shoreline Management Plan reviews, the Local Nature Recovery Strategy, and the Isle of Wight Biosphere steering committee.
- However, participants stressed that engagement must go beyond formal consultation and become more hands-on and understandable for “everyday people.”
The role of science, foresight, and digital tools
- Scientific knowledge: At the time of WS1, the use of scientific knowledge had not yet been fully assessed. This was explicitly postponed for further work before WS2
- Strategic foresight is very limited on the island and mainly restricted to future coastal defense scenarios for flood protection schemes.
- E-government tools: No meaningful digital governance tools or e-tools were identified for the case study
Important implication
Without stronger foresight tools and better use of evidence, governance remains reactive rather than anticipatory.
The Solent - Workshop 2
The second workshop focused on identifying the island’s key vulnerabilities linked to climate change, coastal change, and demographic pressures. Discussions explored how environmental and social risks interact and what this means for the long-term future of coastal communities.
1. Assessment of climate-related vulnerabilities
Participants reviewed the impacts of sea-level rise, stronger storms, pluvial flooding, and coastal erosion, particularly in Sandown Bay, Ventnor, Shanklin, and the Eastern Yar floodplain.
2. Discussion of demographic pressures
Youth outmigration emerged as a major long-term concern, with stakeholders warning that continued population loss could undermine the viability of communities and future infrastructure investment.
3. Review of human pressures
Tourism dependency, agricultural runoff, sewage pollution, and low ocean literacy were identified as major contributors to ecological degradation and governance challenges.
4. Recognition of linked coastal systems
Participants stressed that rivers, estuaries, agriculture, and the coastline must be treated as connected systems rather than separate policy areas.
5. Framing future resilience pathways
The workshop concluded that future planning should move beyond immediate infrastructure repair and focus on the long-term future of coastal communities and island identity.
The Solent - Workshop 3
The final workshop explored governance barriers and opportunities for integrated land-sea management. Discussions focused on improving policy accessibility, strengthening participation, and developing more strategic long-term planning approaches for the island.
1. Identification of governance barriers
Participants highlighted fragmented responsibilities, overlapping environmental designations, and slow decision-making processes as key barriers to effective coastal management.
2. Review of participatory practices
Existing processes such as Shoreline Management Plan reviews and the Local Nature Recovery Strategy showed strong consultation practices, but broader public engagement remains difficult due to low environmental literacy.
3. Discussion of policy accessibility
Stakeholders explained that coastal policy is often difficult to locate and understand, making it hard for communities to engage meaningfully in decision-making.
4. Strategic foresight assessment
Long-term planning remains limited, with only a few coastal defence scenario studies available. Participants saw strong potential for strategic foresight to improve future planning and political vision.
5. Recommendations for integrated governance
The workshop concluded that stronger education, clearer communication, and a shift from short-term maintenance toward proactive adaptation are essential to create a more resilient future for the Isle of Wight.





